Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

August 7, 2026; Marseille, France
VIII International Scientific and Theoretical Conference «Modern vision of implementing innovations in scientific studies»

Papers indexed in Google Scholar

SCIENTIFIC AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF PROFESSIONALLY ORIENTED PHYSICS TEACHING FOR STUDENTS OF CHEMICAL-TECHNOLOGICAL SPECIALTIES UNDER THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF EDUCATION

Published 07.08.2026

  • A. Khudayberdiyeva
    •

A. Khudayberdiyeva
Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Uzbekistan

PDF

Abstract

Modern chemical and food industry is a sector in which virtually every production operation relies on specific physical laws: milk pasteurization requires exact calculation of the heat and heating time; pipeline and pumping -station operation is governed by Bernoulli’s equation and the laws of hydrodynamics; the choice of heat -exchange equipment material is determined by Fourier’s law and thermal-conductivity coefficients; and quality control — from the fat content of milk to the purity of solutions — is largely carried out by spectral and optical analysis. A process engineer w ho lacks sufficient command of this physical apparatus cannot design a production line, justify its operating regime, or explain deviations of process parameters from the norm. Physics in the training of a chemical - technological engineer therefore cannot b e regarded as a general -education discipline preceding the professional cycle — it is its direct scientific foundation.

Author Biography

A. Khudayberdiyeva

Cand. Sc. (Pedagogy), Prof.

References

  1. Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education. Requirements for the training of engineering specialists.
  2. UNESCO. Digital Learning and Transformation of Higher Education: Policy and Practice. — Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2022.
  3. Kudryavtsev V.A., Levina E.V. Digital Technologies in Higher Education: Theory and Practice of Application. — Moscow: Yurayt, 2023.
  4. Robert I.V. Theory and Methodology of the Informatization of Education. — Moscow: BINOM, 2020.
  5. Andreev A.A. Distance Learning and the Digital Educational Environment of Higher Education. — Moscow: Akademiya, 2021.
  6. Khudayberdiyeva A.I. The Use of Innovative and Pedagogical Technologies in Higher Education // Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. — 2025.
  7. Khudayberdiyeva A.I. Modern Approaches to Improving the Educational Process in Technical Universities // Scientific Research in Education. — 2025.
  8. UNESCO. AI and Education: Guidance for Policy-makers. — Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2021. — 50 p.
  9. OECD. Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem. — Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. — 250 p.
  10. European Commission. Digital Education Action Plan 2021 –2027: Resetting Education and Training for the Digital Age. — Brussels: European Union, 2021.
  11. Freeman S., Eddy S.L., McDonough M. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. — 2014. — Vol. 111(23). — P. 8410–8415.
  12. Hake R.R. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses // American Journal of Physics. — 1998. — Vol. 66(1). — P. 64–74.
  13. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. — New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1997. — 253 p.
  14. Wieman C. Improving How Universities Teach Science: Lessons from the Science Education Initiative. — Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017.
  15. Bransford J.D., Brown A.L., Cocking R.R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. — Washington: National Academy Press, 2000.
  16. Mayer R.E. Multimedia Learning. — 3rd Edition. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. — 328 p.
  17. Jonassen D.H. Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem -Solving Learning Environments. — New York: Routledge, 2011.
  18. Bybee R.W. STEM Education: Now More Than Ever. — Arlington: NSTA Press, 2018.
  19. Kelley T.R., Knowles J.G. A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education // International Journal of STEM Education. — 2016. — Vol. 3. — Article 11.
  20. Kholiq A., Putri N.A. The effectiveness of digital learning media in physics education // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. — 2021. — Vol. 1816.
  21. Serway R.A., Jewett J.W. Physics for Scientists and Engineers. — 10th Edition. — Boston: Cengage Learning, 2018.
  22. Halliday D., Resnick R., Walker J. Fundamentals of Physics. — 12th Edition. — Hoboken: Wiley, 2021.
  23. Polat E.S. Modern Pedagogical and Information Technologies in the Education System. — Moscow: Akademiya, 2020. — 368 p.
  24. Bespal’ko V.P. Components of Pedagogical Technology. — Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989. — 192 p.
  25. Selevko G.K. Modern Educational Technologies. — Moscow: Narodnoye Obrazovaniye, 2008.
  26. Mirsamikova R. Modern Approaches to Improving the Educational Process in Technical Universities // Scientific Research in Education. — 2025.
  27. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF –5847, “On the Concept for the Development of the Higher Education System until 2030.” — Tashkent, 2019.
  28. Resolutions of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Measures to Further Improve the System of Education and Upbringing.” — Tashkent.
  29. Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovations of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Methodological Recommendations on the Introduction of Digital Technologies in Higher Education. — Tashkent, 2023.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.