Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

August 21, 2026; Liverpool, UK
XI International Scientific and Theoretical Conference «Theoretical and practical scientific achievements: research and results of their implementation»

Papers indexed in Google Scholar

PEDAGOGICAL NECESSITY FOR DEVELOPING FUTURE TEACHERS’ COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE AND ITS FUNCTIONAL-INTEGRATIVE STRUCTURE

Published 21.08.2026

  • Akmaljon Yusufovich Axmedov
    •

Akmaljon Yusufovich Axmedov
Fergana State University, Uzbekistan

PDF

Abstract

Substantive and technological changes in contemporary education require a new interpretation of the teacher’s professional role. A teacher is no longer merely a specialist who transmits instructional information, but a professional agent who encourages learners to think, supports their individual development, organizes collaboration, and creates a psychologically safe communication environment. All these responsibilities depend on the teacher’s interaction with other people. Therefore, communicative competence is not a secondary attribute of professional teacher preparation; rather, it is a foundational quality that activates theoretical knowledge and methodological expertise in real educational situations. Through pedagogical communication, educational goals are explained, learning activities are coordinated, motivation is supported, feedback is provided, cooperation with parents and colleagues is established, and problematic situations are managed. The ability to express ideas fluently is not sufficient for these purposes.

Author Biography

Akmaljon Yusufovich Axmedov

Lecturer, Department of Pedagogy

References

  1. Hymes, D. H. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  2. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
  3. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Petrovskaya, L. A. (1989). Kompetentnost ’ v obshchenii: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskiy trening [Competence in Communication: Socio-Psychological Training]. Moscow: Moscow State University Press. 216 p. (In Russian).
  5. Sidorenko, E. V. (2008). Trening kommunikativnoy kompetentnosti v delovom vzaimode ystvii [Communicative Competence Training in Business Interaction]. St Petersburg: Rech. 208 p. ISBN 5-9268-0117-6. (In Russian).
  6. Zimnyaya, I. A. (2003). Klyuchevye kompetentsii — novaya paradigma rezul’tata obrazovaniya [Key Competencies: A New Paradigm of Educational Outcomes]. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya, 5, 34–42. (In Russian).
  7. Khutorskoy, A. V. (2003). Klyuchevye kompetentsii kak komponent lichnostno-orientirovannoy paradigmy obrazovaniya [Key Competencies as a Component of the Learner-Centred Educational Paradigm]. Narodnoe obrazovanie, 2, 58–64. (In Russian).
  8. Muslimov, N. A., Usmonboyeva, M. H., Sayfurov, D. M., & To‘rayev, A. B. (2015). Pedagogik kompetentlik va kreativlik asoslari [Fundamentals of Pedagogical Competence and Creativity]: Teaching and Methodological Manual. Tashkent: Sano-standart. 120 p. (In Uzbek).
  9. Xodjayev, B. X. (2017). Umumiy pedagogika nazariyasi va amaliyoti [Theory and Practice of General Pedagogy]: Textbook. Tashkent: Sano-standart. 416 p. (In Uzbek).
  10. UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers (Version 3). Paris: UNESCO. 68 p. ISBN 978-92-3-100285-4.
  11. Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
  12. Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring Inclusive Pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
  13. Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
  14. Sutton, R. E. (2004). Emotional Regulation Goals and Strategies of Teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 7(4), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-004-4229-y
  15. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Conflict Resolution and Peer Mediation Programs in Elementary and Secondary Schools: A Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 459–506. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004459
  16. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.