Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

October 2, 2026; Kraków, Poland
XII International Scientific and Theoretical Conference «Theory and practice of modern science»

Papers indexed in Google Scholar

DURATION OF DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION METHODS

Published 02.10.2026

  • Ramozon Karim o‘g‘li Nomozov
    • ,
  • Marg‘uba Komilovna Hamroyeva
    •

Ramozon Karim o‘g‘li Nomozov
Denov Institute of Entrepreneurship and Pedagogy; Republic of Uzbekistan

Marg‘uba Komilovna Hamroyeva
Denov Institute of Entrepreneurship and Pedagogy; Republic of Uzbekistan

PDF

Abstract

Water availability is an important factor determining the growth and development of soybean. Changes in soil water supply can influence the rate of plant development and the timing of reproductive stages, including flowering and physiological maturity. Therefore, evaluating the duration of soybean development under different irrigation methods is important for assessing varietal adaptation and optimizing crop water management. The duration of soybean development is strongly determined by genetic characteristics. Liu et al. (2016) studied 146 soybean cultivars and found significant variation in days to flowering, flowering-to-maturity duration, and days to maturity. The authors also demonstrated significant effects of genotype, environment, and genotype × environment interaction on these traits. Photoperiod is another major factor regulating soybean developmental duration. Wang et al. (2021) demonstrated that photoperiod regulates both vegetative and reproductive development in soybean and that genetic variation in GmRAV is associated with differences in flowering time and maturity.

Author Biography

Ramozon Karim o‘g‘li Nomozov

PhD student

Marg‘uba Komilovna Hamroyeva

Head of the Department of Biology and Agricultural Products Technology

References

  1. Liu Z, Li H, Fan X, Huang W, Yang J, Li C, Wen Z, Li Y, Guan R, Guo Y, Chang R, Wang D, Wang S, Qiu LJ. (2016). Phenotypic characterization and genetic dissection of growth period traits in soybean (Glycine max) using association mapping. PLoS ONE, 11(7): e0158602. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158602.
  2. Wang Y, Xu C, Sun J, Dong L, Li M, Liu Y, Wang J, Zhang X, Li D, Sun J, Zhang Y, Shan J, Li W, Zhao L. (2021). GmRAV confers ecological adaptation through photoperiod control of flowering time and maturity in soybean. Plant Physiology, 187(1): 361–377. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab255.
  3. Desclaux D, Roumet P. (1996). Impact of drought stress on the phenology of two soybean (Glycine max L. Merr) cultivars. Field Crops Research, 46(1–3): 61–70. DOI: 10.1016/0378-4290(95)00086-0.
  4. Eck HV, Mathers AC, Musick JT. (1987). Plant water stress at various growth stages and growth and yield of soybeans. Field Crops Research, 17(1): 1–16. DOI: 10.1016/0378-4290(87)90077-3.
  5. Jha PK, Kumar SN, Ines AVM. (2018). Responses of soybean to water stress and supplemental irrigation in upper Indo-Gangetic plain: Field experiment and modeling approach. Field Crops Research, 219: 76–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.029.
  6. Доспехов Б.А. (1985). Методика полевого опыта (с основами статистической обработки результатов исследований). 5-е изд., доп. и перераб. М.: Агропромиздат, 351 с.
  7. Desclaux D, Roumet P. (1996). Impact of drought stress on the phenology of two soybean (Glycine max L. Merr) cultivars. Field Crops Research, 46(1–3): 61–70. DOI: 10.1016/0378-4290(95)00086-0.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.