Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

March 24, 2023; Zagreb, Croatia
I International Scientific and Theoretical Conference «Scientific method: reality and future trends of researching»

Papers indexed in Google Scholar

OPTIMIZING SHIP LOGISTICS THROUGH ADVANCED AI ALGORITHMS: REVOLUTIONIZING THE FUTURE OF MARITIME RESEARCH

Published 04.04.2023

  • Miller Tymoteusz
    • ,
  • Irmina Durlik
    • ,
  • Polina Kozlovska
    • ,
  • Adrianna Krzemińska
    • ,
  • Milena Jawor
    • ,
  • Danuta Cembrowska-Lech
    • ,
  • Anna Kisiel
    • ,
  • Sofia Mosiundz
    • ,
  • Maciej Kołodziejczak
    •
PDF

Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have played a vital role in transforming the way industries optimize their processes, including the maritime industry. The scientific method has evolved with the integration of AI, paving the way for advanced research in ship logistics optimization. This article explores the cutting-edge AI algorithms applied to enhance ship logistic optimization, focusing on their implementation, challenges, and potential future trends in maritime research.

References

  1. Akyildiz, I. F., Wang, X., & Lin, S. C. (2020). SoftWater: Software-defined networking for next-generation underwater communication systems. Ad Hoc Networks, 97, 101982.
  2. Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 189, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  3. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2018). Fairness and Machine Learning. fairmlbook.org.
  4. Bendul, J. C., Kreutzfeldt, J., & Michalski, F. (2020). Digital transformation in maritime logistics: The case of smart container terminals. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 105583.
  5. Bessen, J. E. (2019). AI and Jobs: The Role of Demand. NBER Working Paper No. 24235.
  6. Crawford, K. (2017). The trouble with bias. Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).
  7. Dignum, V. (2018). Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Springer International Publishing.
  8. Golias, M. M., Boile, M., & Theofanis, S. (2009). Berth scheduling by customer service differentiation: A multi-objective approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(6), 878-892.
  9. Guan, Y., & Cheung, R. K. (2004). The berth allocation problem: Models and solution methods. OR Spectrum, 26(1), 75-92.
  10. Hogh, A., & Andersen, H. B. (2018). Seafarer fatigue: A review of risk factors, consequences for seafarers’ health and safety, and options for mitigation. International Maritime Health, 69(2), 104-114.
  11. Kurata, H., Yao, T., Luo, Y., Sugimura, N., & Ishikawa, K. (2018). Digital twin: Integrating the real and virtual spaces. Hitachi Review, 67(4), 146-151.
  12. Lalla-Ruiz, E., Voß, S., & Minner, S. (2016). A matheuristic for berth allocation and quay crane assignment in bulk ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(3), 1001-1012.
  13. Lee, J. J. (2018). Human-centered AI: Symbiosis and harmony. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 32(1), 1-2.
  14. Mansour, O., Bujorianu, M. L., & Bujorianu, M. C. (2020). AI for green shipping: The potential of reinforcement learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 122767.
  15. Meyer, R. M., Wang, X., Dignum, V., & Pan, Y. (2021). Artificial intelligence in shipping: Challenges, opportunities and future directions. Marine Policy, 128, 104460.
  16. Nikolopoulos, K., Punia, S., Schmitt, T. A., & Tsinopoulos, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the maritime industry: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,
  17. 144, 102284. 17. Pani, C., Dessì, N., Fancellu, G., & Iannelli, L. (2018). A multi-agent framework for port operations: An application to the port of Cagliari. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 118, 40-60.
  18. Psaraftis, H. N., Wen, M., & Kontovas, C. A. (2021). Speed optimization in maritime transportation: A review of the speed/consumption/emissions trade-off. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 147, 102271.
  19. Rahikainen, M., & Luoma, E. (2020). Cybersecurity in the maritime industry: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(7), 511.
  20. Shahzad, F., Xia, J., Shahzad, U., & Sivakumar, A. I. (2021). Digitalization in maritime industry: A review of blockchain technology. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(1), 31.
  21. Von Solms, R., & Van Niekerk, J. (2013). From information security to cyber security. Computers & Security, 38, 97-102.
  22. Wagner, B. (2018). Ethics as an escape from regulation: From ethics-washing to ethics-shopping? In M. Hildebrandt (Ed.), Being Profiled: Cogitas Ergo Sum (pp. 84-90). Amsterdam University Press.
  23. Wang, S., & Meng, Q. (2012). Liner ship fleet deployment with container transshipment operations. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(2), 470-484.
  24. Yang, Z., Bonsall, S., & Wang, J. (2014). Approximate Markov chain modeling of accident risk for RoPax vessels. Ocean Engineering, 79, 30-47.
  25. Zhang, W., Yan, W., & Yang, Y. (2020). A review of the recent research on the maritime integrated transportation system. Transport Reviews, 40(4), 524-548

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Miller Tymoteusz , Irmina Durlik, Polina Kozlovska, Adrianna Krzemińska, Milena Jawor, Danuta Cembrowska-Lech, Anna Kisiel, Sofia Mosiundz, Maciej Kołodziejczak